In some universities and some well‑resourced schools, “HyFlex” setups have become a shorthand for teaching that is simultaneously in‑person and online. A typical HyFlex classroom combines multiple high‑quality cameras, ceiling or boundary microphones, interactive displays, and integrated video‑conferencing tools so that students can participate whether they are physically present or joining remotely. Sessions are often recorded and automatically uploaded to a learning management system (LMS), where slides, transcripts, and resources live alongside discussion forums and quizzes.​

Around this core infrastructure sits a layer of engagement software: digital whiteboards, polling tools, breakout‑room managers, and collaborative document spaces where in‑person and remote students can work together in real time. Increasingly, AI features are embedded into these platforms – for example, auto‑generated lecture summaries, key‑point highlights, and suggested quiz questions derived from session transcripts. The stated goal is flexibility: students can choose whether to attend in person, live online, or asynchronously via recordings, without (in theory) sacrificing learning quality.​

Private tutors and small learning providers are unlikely to install full HyFlex rigs, but the same ideas are seeping into everyday practice. Many tutors now use a combination of decent microphones and webcams, shared online whiteboards, screen‑sharing, and asynchronous tools such as video feedback or annotated documents. Some platforms aimed at tutors are beginning to offer lightweight versions of LMS features – session recording, automatic note capture, and basic analytics about attendance and engagement. The question for a practice such as here at Turtle & Elephant is not “How do we replicate a university lecture theatre?” but “Which pieces of this ecosystem might genuinely improve one‑to‑one and small‑group learning and how would any risks involved be effectively mitigated?”​

What’s Worth Adopting – and How to Avoid the Traps

For individual students and families, the potential benefits of hybrid‑style tutoring are clear. Students juggling school, work, or caring responsibilities can attend sessions more reliably if occasional remote attendance is built into the norm rather than treated as an exception. High‑quality audio and visual setups make it easier to read facial expressions, annotate texts together, and share student work without constant friction of “Can you see this?” Short, focused recordings – for example, a five‑minute recap of how to structure a paragraph, or a walk‑through of a model plan – can be revisited before exams, reducing the need to reteach basics in paid time.​

For tutors, some aspects of HyFlex thinking can actually protect energy. Rather than trying to recreate a full lesson from memory in individual follow‑up emails, a recorded explanation or reusable resource can serve multiple students who struggle with the same concept. Shared documents and whiteboards also make thinking more visible: you can see, in real time, where a student hesitates or skips steps (and which steps they might skip), and adjust your questioning and a process accordingly. Over time, a modest library of annotated examples and mini‑lessons becomes an asset you can draw on in both one‑to‑one and small‑group settings.​

However, there are significant traps. Recording minors would introduce complex privacy and consent issues: families need to know what is recorded, where it is stored, who has access, and how long it is kept. Over‑recording (particularly if it were to be of every moment of every lesson) can also create a sense of surveillance rather than support, particularly for anxious learners. On the pedagogical side, there is a risk of drifting towards “broadcast mode”: long monologues delivered to camera while students, especially those online, become passive note‑takers. Managing chat, cameras, whiteboards, and content simultaneously can overload a solo tutor, leading to split attention and shallow dialogue.​

A more sustainable approach for a practice like ours Turtle & Elephant might follow a few principles, several of which we already implement:

• Start with minimal viable tech. One reliable microphone, a stable camera angle, and a shared document or whiteboard will take you most of the way; only add extra tools once those feel effortless.​
• Record concepts, not people. Instead of capturing entire sessions, create short, de‑personalised screencasts that walk through key ideas using anonymised examples. These can be shared with multiple students without storing their images or voices.​
• Make interaction the priority. Use tech to amplify dialogue – for example, having each student type or highlight in a shared document – rather than as a stage for polished mini‑lectures.​
• Be explicit about consent and boundaries. Put your recording and data‑handling policies in writing, discuss them with families, and invite questions. Make it clear that students and families can ask for recordings to be deleted at any point, even if they have stopped having classes with the service.​

When treated as potential tools rather than an inevitable, hybrid and HyFlex technologies can make tutoring more humane, not less: more options for how to show up, more ways to revisit ideas, and more visibility into thinking. The thought  lies in taking only the pieces that serve those goals – and resisting the pressure to turn every quiet, thoughtful lesson into a adhoc TV studio.

Note: the first draft of this article was done by AI Chatbot Claude with the support of Max Capacity. The text was then edited and adapted by Jaye Sergeant of Turtle & elephant, who is responsible for the published version.

‍